
Tahm Kench Support has a 50.6% win rate in all ranks over 100,057 games.
Find below a detailed breakdown of Tahm Kench's builds, items, runes, matchups and more. You can filter most information by first item and main rune, by position and by elo.
25.7%
0.2%
1.2%
1.0%
71.9%
EMERALD +
ALL RANKS
Win
50.6%
Games
100,057
Hide
Starting Items


50.7%
88,187
First

51.4%
84,640
Boots

50.4%
57,594
Second

73.3%
13,529
Late Game Options

73.6%
2,917

63.8%
11,389

61.5%
14,462
Runes



51.0%
79,479
Summoner Spells


50.7 %
77,034
Skill Order
51.6 %
71,079
Click an item to filter the rest of the stats by it

51.4%
84,640

46.3%
8,068

43.7%
2,437

44.9%
2,047

47.7%
1,552

48.4%
610
Show more
Click a rune to filter the rest of the stats by it

51.0%
79,479

48.6%
16,229

49.0%
1,629

50.2%
1,501

49.8%
685

56.9%
306
Show more
49.4%
895
49.3%
381
47.9%
353
48.1%
495
-
0
45.7%
433
-
0
51.8%
701
-
0
49.4%
233
47.2%
436
49.8%
960
50.0%
38
44.7%
170
40.0%
20
43.5%
168
58.1%
31
41.4%
29
45.7%
186
33.3%
9
45.5%
33
48.6%
222
50.6%
979
50.3%
300
42.4%
59
43.3%
60
50.9%
1,382
51.0%
873
48.9%
617
63.6%
11
43.8%
16
57.6%
257
56.3%
32
57.4%
263
35.3%
17
64.0%
25
64.8%
142
58.6%
29
47.8%
134
51.1%
5,089
48.8%
17,749
51.0%
73,552
50.7%
2,446
51.0%
77,079
48.7%
16,865
51.4%
7,074
49.4%
20,797
50.9%
68,519
48.5%
17,317
45.4%
438
51.8%
112
41.7%
120
-
0
50.9%
57
-
0
48.0%
329
-
0
45.0%
149
44.9%
334
48.6%
17,584
53.3%
285
51.2%
289
40.9%
93
47.5%
343
48.4%
190
45.8%
83
54.1%
244
52.4%
84
47.6%
225
51.5%
229
51.3%
2,784
50.0%
582
47.3%
74
43.9%
66
48.6%
15,512
51.6%
1,252
48.6%
16,428
38.5%
39
33.3%
21
51.7%
58,092
50.5%
550
51.7%
57,900
50.1%
759
48.8%
84
53.0%
855
51.0%
404
53.3%
1,141
47.9%
309
51.5%
388
48.8%
285
54.8%
188
49.9%
921
51.4%
957
50.6%
847
47.3%
579
52.9%
584
50.4%
1,656
50.6%
95,519
49.3%
2,878
49.9%
2,750
50.9%
2,922
50.6%
94,381
52.0%
4,191
49.6%
2,548
50.5%
93,314
The most popular keystone rune for Tahm Kench is Grasp of the Undying with 51.0% win rate over 79,479 games.
Other alternative runes for Tahm Kench to pick are: